3-7 days from $4,000

Security Release Gate

Know if your AI is safe to ship. PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict + fix brief + release recommendation.

Built for a European construction company 300+ docs structured 36 API functions Production in 4 weeks

What This Is

A structured security and architecture review that produces a clear PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict for your AI system. You get an evidence chain, a findings register with severity classification, and a release recommendation your leadership can act on.

The Problem

You're shipping AI systems, but you don't know if they're safe. There's no formal review process, no audit trail, and no way to prove compliance to leadership or regulators. Every release is a gamble — and the cost of getting it wrong grows with every user who depends on the system.

What We Do

Our process

Scope alignment — define system boundaries, data flows, and threat model

Architecture review — system design, component boundaries, trust surfaces

Access and permissions audit — who can do what, and is it actually enforced?

Integration safety check — third-party APIs, prompt injection surfaces, tool-use risks

Auditability assessment — can you prove what your AI did and why?

Unsafe release path detection — rollback readiness, deployment hygiene, fail-safes

Produce PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict with full evidence chain

Deliver executive summary, findings register, and remediation roadmap

Who Needs This

Is this right for you?

Before AI rollout — catch risks before they reach production users

Before scaling — ensure your system holds under load and regulatory scrutiny

No formal review process — you're shipping without a safety net

AI works but trust is weak — stakeholders need proof it's safe

After a rushed MVP — the system is live, but nobody reviewed it

Regulatory pressure — you need audit-ready documentation

What You Get

Deliverables

Executive summary for leadership (non-technical, decision-grade)

Findings register with severity classification (Critical / High / Medium / Low)

PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict with supporting evidence chain

Remediation roadmap with prioritized fixes and effort estimates

Release recommendation: ready / ready with conditions / not ready

Full audit trail — evidence chain documenting every finding

Architecture risk diagram

After This Engagement

What changes for you

You have a clear, defensible answer to "is this safe to ship?"

Leadership gets a non-technical summary they can act on immediately

Critical risks are caught before they reach users — not after

You have an audit-ready evidence chain for compliance and governance

Your team has a prioritized fix list, not an overwhelming wall of issues

Proof

Built on Arbitra — our own governance engine

Security Gate is powered by the same Arbitra runtime we use internally: 6-gate enforcement engine, automated evidence collection, OWASP 10/10 coverage. This isn't a consulting checklist — it's a systematic, automated-first review backed by 300+ tests.

6-gate engineOWASP 10/10300+ automated tests

See proof →

Investment

Choose the right tier

3–7 days depending on system complexity. Includes both automated and manual review. Scope increases for multi-system or multi-tenant architectures.

Standard

$4,000

3–5 days

Single system review
Automated + manual checks
PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict
Findings register
Remediation roadmap

Request Security Review

Common Questions

What does PASS / WARN / FAIL mean in practice?

PASS — the system is acceptable to release within the stated scope. WARN — it can ship, but with documented risks and recommended mitigations. FAIL — critical issues must be resolved before release. Each verdict comes with full evidence.

Is this a penetration test?

No. This is an architecture and system security review for AI workflows and integration surfaces. A full pentest can be scoped separately if needed.

Can we do this before our first release?

That's the ideal timing. A security gate before first release catches issues when they're cheapest to fix. Many clients run this as the final step before going live.

What if our system is already live?

We run the same review on live systems. If issues are found, you get a remediation roadmap prioritized by severity and risk exposure.

Do you need source code access?

Not always. We can assess architecture, APIs, and system behavior externally. Source access enables deeper analysis but isn't required for a meaningful review.

Does this work for no-code / low-code AI systems?

Yes. No-code platforms still have data flows, permission models, and integration surfaces that need review. The review adapts to the stack.

What happens after a FAIL verdict?

You get a prioritized fix brief with clear remediation steps. We can also help implement the fixes and re-run the gate to confirm resolution.

Can this be done on a recurring basis?

Yes. Our Release Assurance retainer (from $5,000/mo) provides continuous security gating for every deployment, with evidence collection and governance reporting.

What is not included

Full penetration testing (available on request as separate engagement)

Implementation of remediation fixes (we can help — quoted separately)

Ongoing security monitoring (available via Release Assurance retainer)

Compliance certification (we prepare the evidence; certification bodies certify)

Related Case Studies

European construction company

Full AI system in 4 weeks: 300+ documents, 36 API functions, 3 AI assistants.

Read case →

Atmiora

Symbolic intelligence platform: 13 pages, 3 AI engines, automated QA. Live at atmiora.com.

Read case →

Get Started

Find Out Where AI Can Save You the Most Time

Start with an AI System Health Check. 1-2 days, from $500, zero commitment. You get a structured report with your biggest opportunities.

Get Your Health Check From $500 · 1-2 days · Zero commitment

Security Gate

from $4,000

Request Security Review